You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Bartonella species bacteremia in association with adult psychosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychiatry, June 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1388442 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shannon Delaney, Cynthia Robveille, Ricardo G. Maggi, Erin Lashnits, Emily Kingston, Chance Liedig, Lilly Murray, Brian A. Fallon, Edward B. Breitschwerdt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Ukraine | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Israel | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 33 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 31 | 84% |
| Scientists | 5 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 112. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2024.
All research outputs
#393,575
of 26,215,093 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#259
of 13,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,882
of 229,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#2
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,215,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,036 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,066 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.