The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Utilizing portable electroencephalography to screen for pathology of Alzheimer’s disease: a methodological advancement in diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychiatry, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1392158 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Masahiro Hata, Yuki Miyazaki, Kohji Mori, Kenji Yoshiyama, Shoshin Akamine, Hideki Kanemoto, Shiho Gotoh, Hisaki Omori, Atsuya Hirashima, Yuto Satake, Takashi Suehiro, Shun Takahashi, Manabu Ikeda |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2024.
All research outputs
#5,031,748
of 26,146,017 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#2,818
of 13,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,360
of 226,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#20
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,146,017 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,006 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,091 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.