The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Reduced resting-state functional connectivity between insula and inferior frontal gyrus and superior temporal gyrus in hoarding disorder
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Psychiatry, June 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1399062 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kenta Kato, Hirofumi Tomiyama, Keitaro Murayama, Taro Mizobe, Akira Matsuo, Nami Nishida, Kou Matukuma, Mingi Kang, Kenta Sashikata, Kazufumi Kikuchi, Osamu Togao, Tomohiro Nakao |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 50% |
Researcher | 1 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 50% |
Psychology | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2024.
All research outputs
#4,565,198
of 26,233,885 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#2,640
of 13,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,571
of 190,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#16
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,233,885 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,039 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,801 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.