↓ Skip to main content

Negative and positive urgency as pathways in the intergenerational transmission of suicide risk in childhood

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, September 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Negative and positive urgency as pathways in the intergenerational transmission of suicide risk in childhood
Published in
Frontiers in Psychiatry, September 2024
DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1417991
Authors

Ana Ortin-Peralta, Amara Schiffman, Jill Malik, Lillian Polanco-Roman, Laura Hennefield, Katherine Luking

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2024.
All research outputs
#23,794,045
of 26,485,222 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#10,323
of 13,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,826
of 126,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#65
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,485,222 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,270 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,857 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.