↓ Skip to main content

Transcranial alternating current stimulation for neuropsychiatric disorders: a systematic review of treatment parameters and outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, August 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Transcranial alternating current stimulation for neuropsychiatric disorders: a systematic review of treatment parameters and outcomes
Published in
Frontiers in Psychiatry, August 2024
DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1419243
Authors

Fatemeh Gholamali Nezhad, Josh Martin, Vanessa K. Tassone, Alyssa Swiderski, Ilya Demchenko, Somieya Khan, Hamzah E. Chaudhry, Annalisa Palmisano, Emiliano Santarnecchi, Venkat Bhat

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2024.
All research outputs
#23,792,344
of 26,482,830 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#10,368
of 13,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,192
of 139,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#131
of 151 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,482,830 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,207 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,874 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 151 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.