The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 71 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Assisted death in eating disorders: a systematic review of cases and clinical rationales
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychiatry, July 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1431771 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chelsea Roff, Catherine Cook-Cottone |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 8% |
| Austria | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 56 | 79% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 53 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 15% |
| Scientists | 6 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 167. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2024.
All research outputs
#260,420
of 26,561,175 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#188
of 13,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,433
of 233,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#2
of 200 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,561,175 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,230 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,464 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 200 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.