↓ Skip to main content

Optimal dose and type of exercise to improve cognitive function in patients with mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of RCTs

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, September 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Optimal dose and type of exercise to improve cognitive function in patients with mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of RCTs
Published in
Frontiers in Psychiatry, September 2024
DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1436499
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yingying Yu, Junjie Wang, Jian Xu

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2024.
All research outputs
#5,172,645
of 26,720,629 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#2,950
of 13,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,039
of 189,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#20
of 147 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,720,629 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,284 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,647 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 147 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.