The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Dual-Use Research as a Wicked Problem
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, August 2014
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2014.00113 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Gregory D. Koblentz |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 45% |
Austria | 1 | 9% |
France | 1 | 9% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 82% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Scientists | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 19% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 10% |
Student > Master | 2 | 10% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 7 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 14% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 10% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 10% |
Computer Science | 2 | 10% |
Other | 3 | 14% |
Unknown | 7 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2022.
All research outputs
#3,497,897
of 25,139,853 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#1,571
of 13,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,510
of 236,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#14
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,139,853 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,598 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,155 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.