↓ Skip to main content

A Comparative Qualitative Study of Misconceptions Associated with Contraceptive Use in Southern and Northern Ghana

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Public Health, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
232 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Comparative Qualitative Study of Misconceptions Associated with Contraceptive Use in Southern and Northern Ghana
Published in
Frontiers in Public Health, September 2014
DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2014.00137
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philip B. Adongo, Philip T.-N. Tabong, Thomas B. Azongo, James F. Phillips, Mallory C. Sheff, Allison E. Stone, Placide Tapsoba

Abstract

Evidence from Ghana consistently shows that unmet need for contraception is pervasive with many possible causes, yet how these may differ by cultural zone remains poorly understood. This qualitative study was designed to elicit information on the nature and form of misconceptions associated with contraceptive use among northern and southern Ghanaians. Twenty-two focus group discussions (FGDs) with married community members were carried out. Community health officers, community health volunteers, and health care managers were also interviewed using a semi-structured interview guide. FGDs and in-depth interviews were recorded digitally, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using QSR Nvivo 10 to compare contraceptive misconceptions in northern and southern Ghana. Results indicate that misconceptions associated with the use of contraceptives were widespread but similar in both settings. Contraceptives were perceived to predispose women to both primary and secondary infertility, uterine fibroids, and cancers. As regular menstrual flow was believed to prevent uterine fibroids, contraceptive use-related amenorrhea was thought to render acceptors vulnerable to uterine fibroids as well as cervical and breast cancers. Contraceptive acceptors were stigmatized and ridiculed as promiscuous. Among northern respondents, condom use was generally perceived to inhibit erection and therefore capable of inducing male impotence, while in southern Ghana, condom use was believed to reduce sensation and sexual gratification. The study indicates that misconceptions associated with contraceptive use are widespread in both regions. Moreover, despite profound social and contextual differences that distinguish northern and southern Ghanaians, prevailing fears and misconceptions are shared by respondents from both settings. Findings attest to the need for improved communication to provide accurate information for dispelling these misconceptions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 232 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Malawi 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 229 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 60 26%
Student > Master 31 13%
Researcher 25 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 5%
Student > Postgraduate 10 4%
Other 28 12%
Unknown 67 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 60 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 14%
Social Sciences 31 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 3%
Other 25 11%
Unknown 69 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2020.
All research outputs
#17,726,563
of 22,763,032 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#4,878
of 9,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,333
of 238,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#57
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,763,032 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,790 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,416 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.