The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Commentary on “Questioning the HIV–AIDS Hypothesis: 30 Years of Dissent”
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2015.00030 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Seth C. Kalichman |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 8% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| South Africa | 1 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 17 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 79% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 17% |
| Scientists | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 13 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 29% |
| Other | 2 | 14% |
| Professor | 2 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 2 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 2 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2024.
All research outputs
#1,548,555
of 26,230,991 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#800
of 14,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,142
of 370,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#4
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,230,991 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,647 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.