The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Challenges Posed by Tick-Borne Rickettsiae: Eco-Epidemiology and Public Health Implications
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, April 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2015.00055 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marina E. Eremeeva, Gregory A. Dasch |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 190 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 31 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 32 | 17% |
| Unknown | 47 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 35 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 33 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 26 | 13% |
| Unknown | 54 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2015.
All research outputs
#20,567,353
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#7,110
of 14,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,219
of 283,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#48
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,390 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,398 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.