↓ Skip to main content

Economic Evaluation Enhances Public Health Decision Making

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Public Health, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
396 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Economic Evaluation Enhances Public Health Decision Making
Published in
Frontiers in Public Health, June 2015
DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2015.00164
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristina M. Rabarison, Connie L. Bish, Mehran S. Massoudi, Wayne H. Giles

Abstract

Contemporary public health professionals must address the health needs of a diverse population with constrained budgets and shrinking funds. Economic evaluation contributes to evidence-based decision making by helping the public health community identify, measure, and compare activities with the necessary impact, scalability, and sustainability to optimize population health. Asking "how do investments in public health strategies influence or offset the need for downstream spending on medical care and/or social services?" is important when making decisions about resource allocation and scaling of interventions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 396 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 395 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 94 24%
Researcher 37 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 9%
Student > Bachelor 27 7%
Other 20 5%
Other 61 15%
Unknown 122 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 94 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 62 16%
Social Sciences 27 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 15 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 4%
Other 49 12%
Unknown 135 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2024.
All research outputs
#4,916,658
of 26,369,714 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#2,326
of 14,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,026
of 279,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#14
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,369,714 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,728 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,440 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.