The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 74 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Bigger, Brighter, Bluer-Better? Current Light-Emitting Devices – Adverse Sleep Properties and Preventative Strategies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, October 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2015.00233 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul Gringras, Benita Middleton, Debra J. Skene, Victoria L. Revell |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 12% |
| United States | 5 | 7% |
| Saudi Arabia | 5 | 7% |
| France | 3 | 4% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 3% |
| Egypt | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 33 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 53 | 72% |
| Scientists | 11 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 161 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 19% |
| Researcher | 20 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 10% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 32 | 19% |
| Unknown | 39 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 18% |
| Psychology | 21 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 47 | 28% |
| Unknown | 45 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 726. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2024.
All research outputs
#29,907
of 26,556,112 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#29
of 15,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#276
of 291,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#1
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,556,112 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,027 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,804 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.