The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Can Online Discussion Sites Generate Quality Data for Research Purposes?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00156 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Helen Smith, Alpaslan Bulbul, Christina J. Jones |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 12% |
| Researcher | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 17 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 6 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 22 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2017.
All research outputs
#14,816,244
of 22,985,065 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#3,996
of 10,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,650
of 313,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#59
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,985,065 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,154 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,520 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.