The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Health Complaints Associated With Poor Rental Housing Conditions in Arkansas: The Only State Without a Landlord's Implied Warranty of Habitability
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00180 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nathaniel Horwitz-Willis |
| Abstract |
This is a review of an existing article that surveyed the perceived health of renters' in Arkansas. As a first in the field of public health it was able to provide ground-level insight through tenant interviews about housing and health in the state. This review illuminates how the state's sociopolitical characteristics may affect marginalized Arkansas renters. Marginalized renters may include persons living below the poverty line, people of color, and women who are the head of household. This article seeks to elucidate how the upstream factor, habitability law, may impact tenant health in the state. With a novel public health approach, the article contributes to the existing housing and health literature with its invaluable insight of stakeholders' perspectives relating to how habitability law may impact their health outcomes. Now is an opportune time for public health practitioners, researchers, and policymakers to facilitate incremental change to include landlords in their state public health system. Such inclusion may improve housing while promoting, improving, and protecting health outcomes for Arkansas renters. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 43% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 14% |
| Researcher | 1 | 14% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 2 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 29% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 14% |
| Psychology | 1 | 14% |
| Engineering | 1 | 14% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2018.
All research outputs
#14,417,376
of 23,090,520 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#3,682
of 10,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,283
of 328,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#62
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,090,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,396 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.