↓ Skip to main content

Cannabis Legalization in Canada: Reflections on Public Health and the Governance of Legal Psychoactive Substances

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Public Health, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
40 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cannabis Legalization in Canada: Reflections on Public Health and the Governance of Legal Psychoactive Substances
Published in
Frontiers in Public Health, August 2018
DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00220
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jean-François Crépault

Abstract

The Canadian government is "taking a public health approach to legalizing, strictly regulating and restricting access to cannabis." There is, however, no universally accepted definition of a public health approach to cannabis. This paper presents what such an approach is, and is not, and discusses its applicability to legal psychoactive substances more generally. It critically reflects on the role of the public health sector in the governance of addictive substances and activities, noting its function of "responsibilizing" individuals and coaxing them to self-regulate-and the contradiction involved when other state actors involved in governance are actively inciting consumption of those substances and activities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 91 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 22%
Student > Bachelor 14 15%
Researcher 6 7%
Student > Postgraduate 5 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 27 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 13%
Psychology 10 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 9%
Social Sciences 8 9%
Neuroscience 4 4%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 34 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,432,793
of 26,147,626 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#735
of 14,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,767
of 344,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#7
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,147,626 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,594 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,165 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.