↓ Skip to main content

Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Program, Where Is the L-Track?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Public Health, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Program, Where Is the L-Track?
Published in
Frontiers in Public Health, September 2018
DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00264
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wangeci Gatei, Tura Galgalo, Ahmed Abade, Alden Henderson, Mark Rayfield, David McAlister, Joel M. Montgomery, Leonard F. Peruski, Adilya A. Albetkova

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 18%
Other 6 14%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 14 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 6 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 11%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 18 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2019.
All research outputs
#7,327,980
of 23,103,903 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#2,433
of 10,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,594
of 342,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#47
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,903 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,003 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.