The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Digital Delivery of Meditative Movement Training Improved Health of Cigarette-Smoke-Exposed Subjects
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00282 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter Payne, Steven Fiering, David Zava, Thomas J. Gould, Anthony Brown, Paul Hage, Carole Gaudet, Mardi Crane-Godreau |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 30% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 20% |
| Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 50% |
| Scientists | 3 | 30% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 64 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 9% |
| Researcher | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 29 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Psychology | 4 | 6% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 30 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2021.
All research outputs
#4,007,497
of 23,108,064 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#1,429
of 10,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,279
of 349,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#29
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,108,064 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,420 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,386 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.