The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Thinking Critically: How to Teach Translational Medicine
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, October 2018
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00284 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Richard G. Foty, Elizabeth M. Gibbs, Esther H. Lips, Madhvi Menon, Janet P. Hafler |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 17% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
Professor | 2 | 5% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 5% |
Other | 5 | 13% |
Unknown | 20 | 51% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 18% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 8% |
Design | 2 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Unknown | 19 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2018.
All research outputs
#6,894,204
of 25,128,618 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#2,627
of 13,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,514
of 352,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#43
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,128,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,579 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,387 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.