You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Optimizing Precision Medicine for Public Health
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00042 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gemma A. Bilkey, Belinda L. Burns, Emily P. Coles, Trinity Mahede, Gareth Baynam, Kristen J. Nowak |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 25% |
| Spain | 1 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Germany | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 204 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 29 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 30 | 15% |
| Unknown | 74 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 28 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 5% |
| Engineering | 9 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 43 | 21% |
| Unknown | 77 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,737,287
of 25,643,886 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#863
of 14,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,421
of 366,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#17
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,643,886 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,369 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,795 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.