The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Operationalizing One Health Employing Social-Ecological Systems Theory: Lessons From the Greater Mekong Sub-region
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00085 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bruce A. Wilcox, A. Alonso Aguirre, Nicole De Paula, Boripat Siriaroonrat, Pierre Echaubard |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 126 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 17% |
| Unknown | 37 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 9% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 8 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 34 | 27% |
| Unknown | 43 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2022.
All research outputs
#3,588,357
of 25,271,884 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#1,650
of 13,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,841
of 357,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#25
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,271,884 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,800 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,156 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.