You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Intervention Mapping: Theory- and Evidence-Based Health Promotion Program Planning: Perspective and Examples
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00209 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maria E. Fernandez, Robert A. C. Ruiter, Christine M. Markham, Gerjo Kok |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 9% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 5% |
| Sweden | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 13 | 59% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 11 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 8 | 36% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 881 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 881 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 109 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 107 | 12% |
| Researcher | 83 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 74 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 42 | 5% |
| Other | 135 | 15% |
| Unknown | 331 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 151 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 95 | 11% |
| Psychology | 86 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 57 | 6% |
| Sports and Recreations | 14 | 2% |
| Other | 103 | 12% |
| Unknown | 375 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,700,314
of 25,223,158 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#1,225
of 13,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,033
of 348,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#12
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,223,158 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,729 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,718 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.