↓ Skip to main content

Key Findings and Comparisons From Analogous Case-Cluster Studies for Dengue Virus Infection Conducted in Machala, Ecuador, and Kamphaeng Phet, Thailand

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Public Health, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Key Findings and Comparisons From Analogous Case-Cluster Studies for Dengue Virus Infection Conducted in Machala, Ecuador, and Kamphaeng Phet, Thailand
Published in
Frontiers in Public Health, February 2020
DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathryn B. Anderson, Anna M. Stewart-Ibarra, Darunee Buddhari, Efrain Felix Beltran Ayala, Rachel J. Sippy, Sopon Iamsirithaworn, Sadie J. Ryan, Stefan Fernandez, Richard G. Jarman, Stephen J. Thomas, Timothy P. Endy

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 15%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Researcher 5 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 17 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 18 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2020.
All research outputs
#6,344,569
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#2,134
of 11,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,434
of 459,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#23
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,267 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,147 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.