↓ Skip to main content

The Mediating Role of Psychological Capital in the Relationship Between Occupational Stress and Fatigue: A Cross-Sectional Study Among 1,104 Chinese Physicians

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Public Health, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Mediating Role of Psychological Capital in the Relationship Between Occupational Stress and Fatigue: A Cross-Sectional Study Among 1,104 Chinese Physicians
Published in
Frontiers in Public Health, February 2020
DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fangqiong Tian, Qianyi Shu, Qi Cui, Lulu Wang, Chunli Liu, Hui Wu

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 95 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Student > Master 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Lecturer 4 4%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 48 51%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 16 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 7%
Social Sciences 6 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 50 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2020.
All research outputs
#20,607,141
of 23,197,711 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#7,913
of 10,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#305,064
of 359,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#81
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,197,711 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,628 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.