The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Importance of Direct Progeny Measurements for Correct Estimation of Effective Dose Due to Radon and Thoron
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00017 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Guillaume Samuel Bineng, Saïdou, Shinji Tokonami, Masahiro Hosoda, Yvette Flore Tchuente Siaka, Hamadou Issa, Takahito Suzuki, Hiromi Kudo, Oumarou Bouba |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 19% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
| Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 16% |
| Unknown | 9 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 8 | 26% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 13% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 6% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2023.
All research outputs
#8,205,894
of 25,292,646 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#3,269
of 13,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,505
of 470,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#30
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,292,646 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,825 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 470,855 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.