The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Ethics of Taxing Sugar-Sweetened Beverages to Improve Public Health
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00110 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Francisco Goiana-da-Silva, David Cruz-e-Silva, Oliver Bartlett, Joana Vasconcelos, Alexandre Morais Nunes, Hutan Ashrafian, Marisa Miraldo, Maria do Céu Machado, Fernando Araújo, Ara Darzi |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 72 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 4% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 4% |
| Researcher | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 41 | 57% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 44 | 61% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2022.
All research outputs
#7,626,291
of 23,243,271 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#2,629
of 10,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,853
of 343,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#63
of 166 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,243,271 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,713 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,915 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 166 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.