The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Making Implementation Science More Rapid: Use of the RE-AIM Framework for Mid-Course Adaptations Across Five Health Services Research Projects in the Veterans Health Administration
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00194 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Russell E. Glasgow, Catherine Battaglia, Marina McCreight, Roman Aydiko Ayele, Borsika Adrienn Rabin |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 26% |
| Unknown | 20 | 74% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 13 | 48% |
| Members of the public | 12 | 44% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 92 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 18% |
| Unknown | 30 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 7% |
| Psychology | 5 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 41 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2020.
All research outputs
#2,042,574
of 25,286,324 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#942
of 13,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,882
of 401,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#38
of 199 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,286,324 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,818 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,619 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 199 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.