The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Feasibility, Acceptability, and Influence of mHealth-Supported N-of-1 Trials for Enhanced Cognitive and Emotional Well-Being in US Volunteers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00260 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Richard L. Kravitz, Adrian Aguilera, Elaine J. Chen, Yong K. Choi, Eric Hekler, Chris Karr, Katherine K. Kim, Sayali Phatak, Sayantani Sarkar, Stephen M. Schueller, Ida Sim, Jiabei Yang, Christopher H. Schmid |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 25% |
| Canada | 2 | 10% |
| Belgium | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 12 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 50% |
| Scientists | 6 | 30% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 78 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 40 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 13% |
| Psychology | 7 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 42 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2024.
All research outputs
#2,857,097
of 26,427,317 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#1,406
of 14,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,624
of 438,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#51
of 220 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,427,317 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,892 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 220 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.