The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
The Role of Experts in the Covid-19 Pandemic and the Limits of Their Epistemic Authority in Democracy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00356 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrea Lavazza, Mirko Farina |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 12% |
| Colombia | 2 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Austria | 1 | 4% |
| San Marino | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 18 | 69% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 85% |
| Scientists | 3 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 171 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 10% |
| Researcher | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 28 | 16% |
| Unknown | 64 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 35 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 9% |
| Psychology | 11 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 24 | 14% |
| Unknown | 71 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,010,719
of 26,371,446 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#559
of 14,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,678
of 433,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#21
of 234 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,371,446 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,785 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,608 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 234 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.