↓ Skip to main content

Hypothesis: Potentially Systemic Impacts of Elevated CO2 on the Human Proteome and Health

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Public Health, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
32 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hypothesis: Potentially Systemic Impacts of Elevated CO2 on the Human Proteome and Health
Published in
Frontiers in Public Health, November 2020
DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2020.543322
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carlos M. Duarte, Łukasz Jaremko, Mariusz Jaremko

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 11%
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 23 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 8 17%
Chemistry 4 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 22 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,847,271
of 26,380,671 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#941
of 14,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,835
of 417,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#41
of 366 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,380,671 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,795 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 417,987 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 366 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.