The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
First, Do No Harm (Gone Wrong): Total-Scale Analysis of Medical Errors Scientific Literature
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2020.558913 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Atanas G. Atanasov, Andy Wai Kan Yeung, Elisabeth Klager, Fabian Eibensteiner, Eva Schaden, Maria Kletecka-Pulker, Harald Willschke |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 9% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Moldova, Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 48 | 84% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 39 | 68% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 14% |
| Scientists | 6 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 90 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 16% |
| Unknown | 46 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 54 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2024.
All research outputs
#876,682
of 26,515,106 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#490
of 15,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,628
of 442,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#23
of 350 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,515,106 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,009 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,547 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 350 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.