The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Improved Nocturnal Glycaemia and Reduced Insulin Use Following Clinical Exercise Trial Participation in Individuals With Type 1 Diabetes
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, January 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2020.568832 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Olivia McCarthy, Rachel Deere, Max L. Eckstein, Jason Pitt, Ben Wellman, Stephen C. Bain, Othmar Moser, Richard M. Bracken |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 29% |
United States | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 3 | 43% |
Members of the public | 3 | 43% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 52 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 15% |
Researcher | 7 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 12% |
Other | 4 | 8% |
Lecturer | 2 | 4% |
Other | 8 | 15% |
Unknown | 17 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 21% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 15% |
Sports and Recreations | 7 | 13% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
Other | 5 | 10% |
Unknown | 17 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2021.
All research outputs
#4,785,759
of 23,271,751 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#1,752
of 10,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,303
of 503,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#113
of 414 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,271,751 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,749 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 503,269 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 414 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.