The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Regional Distribution of Causes of Death for Small Areas in Brazil, 1998–2017
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2021.601980 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emerson Augusto Baptista, Bernardo Lanza Queiroz, Pedro Cisalpino Pinheiro |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| China | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 10 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 55% |
| Scientists | 4 | 36% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 9 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2021.
All research outputs
#6,287,432
of 25,416,581 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#2,467
of 14,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,596
of 453,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#130
of 499 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,416,581 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,113 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,921 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 499 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.