The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Right Care, First Time: Developing a Theory-Based Automated Protocol to Help Clinically Stage Young People Based on Severity and Persistence of Mental Illness
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, August 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2021.621862 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Frank Iorfino, Vanessa Wan Sze Cheng, Shane P. Cross, Hannah F. Yee, Tracey A. Davenport, Elizabeth M. Scott, Ian B. Hickie |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 40% |
Scientists | 3 | 30% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 20% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 5 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 7% |
Student > Master | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 14 | 48% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 14% |
Psychology | 4 | 14% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 7% |
Computer Science | 2 | 7% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 10% |
Unknown | 13 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2021.
All research outputs
#6,710,024
of 26,589,077 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#2,794
of 15,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,236
of 440,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#134
of 569 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,589,077 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,050 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,095 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 569 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.