↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of Global Health Education: The Role of Multiple-Choice Questions

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Public Health, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessment of Global Health Education: The Role of Multiple-Choice Questions
Published in
Frontiers in Public Health, July 2021
DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2021.640204
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nathan T. Douthit, John Norcini, Keren Mazuz, Michael Alkan, Marie-Therese Feuerstein, A. Mark Clarfield, Tzvi Dwolatzky, Evgeny Solomonov, Igor Waksman, Seema Biswas

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 6%
Student > Master 3 6%
Other 2 4%
Lecturer 2 4%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 4%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 29 60%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Psychology 2 4%
Unspecified 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 28 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2021.
All research outputs
#18,809,260
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#6,136
of 10,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#315,988
of 437,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#356
of 620 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,831 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,839 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 620 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.