↓ Skip to main content

Comparative Evaluation of the Cytotoxicity of Glyphosate-Based Herbicides and Glycine in L929 and Caco2 Cells

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Public Health, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative Evaluation of the Cytotoxicity of Glyphosate-Based Herbicides and Glycine in L929 and Caco2 Cells
Published in
Frontiers in Public Health, May 2021
DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2021.643898
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francesca Truzzi, Daniele Mandrioli, Federica Gnudi, Paul T. J. Scheepers, Ellen K. Silbergeld, Fiorella Belpoggi, Giovanni Dinelli

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Professor 2 6%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 18 51%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 11%
Environmental Science 3 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 19 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2022.
All research outputs
#8,069,987
of 24,932,434 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#3,122
of 13,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,849
of 434,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#168
of 523 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,932,434 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,283 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,473 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 523 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.