↓ Skip to main content

Barriers and Facilitators to Implementation of Value-Based Care Models in New Medicaid Accountable Care Organizations in Massachusetts: A Study Protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Public Health, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Barriers and Facilitators to Implementation of Value-Based Care Models in New Medicaid Accountable Care Organizations in Massachusetts: A Study Protocol
Published in
Frontiers in Public Health, April 2021
DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2021.645665
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah L. Goff, Deborah Gurewich, Matthew Alcusky, Aparna G. Kachoria, Joanne Nicholson, Jay Himmelstein

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Other 2 7%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 12 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 17%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 7%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 12 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2021.
All research outputs
#4,291,135
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#1,589
of 10,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,889
of 434,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#92
of 454 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,825 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 454 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.