The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Electronic Data Management for Vaccine Trials in Low Resource Settings: Upgrades, Scalability, and Impact of ODK
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, November 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2021.665584 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael Marks, Sham Lal, Hannah Brindle, Pierre-Stéphane Gsell, Matthew MacGregor, Callum Stott, Martijn van de Rijdt, Guillermo Gutiérrez Almazor, Suman Golia, Conall Watson, Abdourahamane Diallo, Alhassane Toure, Catherine Houlihan, Patrick Keating, Hélène Martin, Ana-Maria Henao Restrepo, Yaw Anokwa, Chrissy H. Roberts |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 26% |
| United States | 2 | 11% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 68% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 16% |
| Scientists | 3 | 16% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
| Researcher | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 16 | 55% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 18 | 62% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2022.
All research outputs
#2,674,356
of 25,019,915 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#1,199
of 13,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,948
of 435,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#63
of 689 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,019,915 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,435 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 689 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.