The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
PennDemic Simulation Framework: An Innovative Approach to Increase Student Interest and Confidence in Disasters Preparedness/Response and Interdisciplinary Teamwork
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2021.682112 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephen D. Cole, Hillary C. M. Nelson, Bonnie D. Jenkins, Cathy Y. Poon, Shelley C. Rankin, Deborah E. Becker |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 33% |
| Namibia | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 89% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
| Researcher | 2 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 22 | 56% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 10% |
| Engineering | 2 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 23 | 59% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2021.
All research outputs
#5,214,567
of 24,974,461 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#2,179
of 13,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,192
of 440,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#127
of 595 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,974,461 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,342 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,270 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 595 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.