The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Non-pharmacological Approaches to Depressed Elderly With No or Mild Cognitive Impairment in Long-Term Care Facilities. A Systematic Review of the Literature
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2021.685860 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carla Gramaglia, Eleonora Gattoni, Debora Marangon, Diego Concina, Elena Grossini, Carmela Rinaldi, Massimiliano Panella, Patrizia Zeppegno |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 126 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 6% |
| Researcher | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 18% |
| Unknown | 59 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 12% |
| Psychology | 12 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Unknown | 63 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2024.
All research outputs
#3,608,952
of 26,442,002 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#1,817
of 14,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,990
of 451,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#88
of 623 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,442,002 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,925 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,058 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 623 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.