↓ Skip to main content

Health Belief Model, Theory of Planned Behavior, or Psychological Antecedents: What Predicts COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy Better Among the Bangladeshi Adults?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Public Health, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
116 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
357 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Health Belief Model, Theory of Planned Behavior, or Psychological Antecedents: What Predicts COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy Better Among the Bangladeshi Adults?
Published in
Frontiers in Public Health, August 2021
DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2021.711066
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mohammad Bellal Hossain, Zakiul Alam, Syful Islam, Shafayat Sultan, Mahir Faysal, Sharmin Rima, Anwer Hossain, Abdullah Al Mamun

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 357 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 357 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 45 13%
Student > Bachelor 40 11%
Researcher 31 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 2%
Other 34 10%
Unknown 184 52%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 8%
Social Sciences 26 7%
Psychology 15 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 2%
Other 38 11%
Unknown 195 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2022.
All research outputs
#13,423,905
of 23,172,045 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#3,013
of 10,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,878
of 399,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#194
of 593 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,172,045 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,569 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,646 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 593 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.