The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Understanding the Implications of Peer Support for Families of Children With Neurodevelopmental and Intellectual Disabilities: A Scoping Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, November 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2021.719640 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michelle Chakraborti, Mojgan Gitimoghaddam, William H. McKellin, Anton Rodney Miller, Jean-Paul Collet |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 59 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 31 | 53% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 8 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 8% |
| Psychology | 4 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 31 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2022.
All research outputs
#2,852,206
of 23,130,383 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#1,061
of 10,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,005
of 507,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#69
of 704 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,130,383 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,485 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 507,039 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 704 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.