The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
French Version of the Antiphasic Digits-in-Noise Test for Smartphone Hearing Screening
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, October 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2021.725080 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jean-Charles Ceccato, Marie-Josée Duran, De Wet Swanepoel, Cas Smits, Karina C. De Sousa, Lewis Gledhill, Frédéric Venail, Jean-Luc Puel |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 30% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 13% |
Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
Librarian | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 9% |
Unknown | 8 | 35% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 13% |
Computer Science | 2 | 9% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Other | 5 | 22% |
Unknown | 9 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2021.
All research outputs
#14,555,398
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#3,798
of 10,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,415
of 434,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#209
of 595 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,831 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,666 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 595 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.