The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
People Who Die by Suicide Without Receiving Mental Health Services: A Systematic Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2021.736948 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Samantha Tang, Natalie M. Reily, Andrew F. Arena, Philip J. Batterham, Alison L. Calear, Gregory L. Carter, Andrew J. Mackinnon, Helen Christensen |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 9% |
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 8 | 73% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 82% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 84 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 9 | 11% |
| Researcher | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 43 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 10 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 44 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2024.
All research outputs
#2,307,496
of 26,248,133 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#1,152
of 14,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,575
of 530,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#59
of 804 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,248,133 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,651 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 530,851 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 804 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.