The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Systematic Review of Medical Equipment Reliability Assessment in Improving the Quality of Healthcare Services
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2021.753951 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aizat Hilmi Zamzam, Ahmad Khairi Abdul Wahab, Muhammad Mokhzaini Azizan, Suresh Chandra Satapathy, Khin Wee Lai, Khairunnisa Hasikin |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 208 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 3% |
| Lecturer | 6 | 3% |
| Researcher | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 21 | 10% |
| Unknown | 135 | 65% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 24 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 15 | 7% |
| Unknown | 137 | 66% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2024.
All research outputs
#7,661,663
of 26,222,113 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#3,214
of 14,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,473
of 440,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#144
of 564 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,222,113 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,640 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,585 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 564 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.