↓ Skip to main content

ESBL Producing Escherichia coli in Faecal Sludge Treatment Plants: An Invisible Threat to Public Health in Rohingya Camps, Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Public Health, December 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ESBL Producing Escherichia coli in Faecal Sludge Treatment Plants: An Invisible Threat to Public Health in Rohingya Camps, Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh
Published in
Frontiers in Public Health, December 2021
DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2021.783019
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sakib Hossain, Sobur Ali, Monir Hossain, Salman Zahir Uddin, M. Moniruzzaman, Mohammad Rafiqul Islam, Abdullah Mohammad Shohael, Shafiqul Islam, Tazrina Habib Ananya, Mominur Rahman, Mohammad Ashfaqur Rahman, Martin Worth, Dinesh Mondal, Zahid Hayat Mahmud

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 17%
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 15 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 9 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Environmental Science 2 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 14 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2022.
All research outputs
#18,067,338
of 26,435,181 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#6,795
of 14,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#316,873
of 528,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#335
of 744 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,435,181 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,907 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 528,912 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 744 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.