The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Empirical evidence on structural racism as a driver of racial inequities in COVID-19 mortality
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, November 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1007053 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tyson H. Brown, Christina Kamis, Patricia Homan |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 23% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 62% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 46% |
| Scientists | 4 | 31% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 29% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Philosophy | 1 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2022.
All research outputs
#4,699,958
of 26,097,697 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#2,140
of 14,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,820
of 497,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#151
of 1,389 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,097,697 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 497,210 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,389 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.