The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Barefoot doctors: A solution to the dilemma of COVID-19 prevention and control in rural areas of economically underdeveloped countries
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, November 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1020312 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Shi-Wei Hu |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 20% |
Lecturer | 1 | 20% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 20% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2023.
All research outputs
#4,957,225
of 24,823,556 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#2,000
of 13,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,336
of 435,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#142
of 1,523 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,823,556 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,271 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,523 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.