↓ Skip to main content

Carbon sequestration potential of different forest types in Pakistan and its role in regulating services for public health

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Public Health, January 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Carbon sequestration potential of different forest types in Pakistan and its role in regulating services for public health
Published in
Frontiers in Public Health, January 2023
DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1064586
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shahab Ali, Shujaul Mulk Khan, Zeeshan Ahmad, Zafar Siddiq, Abd Ullah, Sunghoon Yoo, Heesup Han, António Raposo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Unspecified 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Lecturer 1 3%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 20 65%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 13%
Environmental Science 3 10%
Unspecified 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 20 65%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2023.
All research outputs
#15,853,124
of 23,556,846 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#5,049
of 11,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#231,762
of 435,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#397
of 1,260 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,556,846 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,370 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,260 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.