The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparison of Fan-Traps and Gravitraps for Aedes Mosquito Surveillance in Taiwan
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, March 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2022.778736 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Chao-Ying Pan, Lie Cheng, Wei-Liang Liu, Matthew P. Su, Hui-Pin Ho, Che-Hun Liao, Jui-Hun Chang, Yu-Chieh Yang, Cheng-Chun Hsu, Joh-Jong Huang, Chun-Hong Chen |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 4 | 13% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 13% |
Unknown | 17 | 55% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 10% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 10% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 10% |
Unknown | 16 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2023.
All research outputs
#3,212,703
of 25,815,269 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#1,514
of 14,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,356
of 465,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#105
of 999 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,815,269 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,428 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 465,535 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 999 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.